Compiling an Annotated Bibliography Worksheet #001
Overview of Learning Activity
In her article “Fear of Reference,” Barbara Fister (2002) reports that some instructors require that each student have a librarian “sign-off on a preliminary bibliography” because it provides “an opportunity [for the librarian] to discuss where else the student might find good material or why some sources may not be particularly good ones.” (p. B20)
The annotated bibliography that you compile for this course will serve a similar purpose. Often, by reviewing the annotated bibliography before you begin writing your final paper, I am able to identify potential difficulties that could have a negative impact on the final paper: questionable credibility of sources, research bias, missing materials, and so forth. Often, it is easier to correct these problems by doing additional research before beginning to write your paper than it is to fix problems of research methodology that appear in a draft.
However, even though I will be reviewing your bibliography and providing you feedback, don’t forget the reference librarian is also available to give you assistance.
Objectives of Activity
At the conclusion of this activity, you will be able to compile an annotated bibliography where
The citations are written in proper academic format. Check to see if your instructor requires MLA (Modern Language Association), APA (American Psychological Association), or some other format.
The citations show a range of research (e.g. books, quality web pages, articles from academic journals, et cetera)
The annotations briefly and accurately summarize the material found in the material being cited.
Directions for Activity
Assessment of Learning Activity
You should submit your completed annotated bibliography to your instructor for evaluation.
| Printer Friendly Versions Download this worksheet as a Microsoft Word File
Download this worksheet as a PDF File
|
|
Avoiding Plagiarism
Stephen Wilhoit (1994) instructs faculty members that “we need to remember that for most students the conventions of academic acknowledgement and documentation prove difficult to understand and master.” Incorrect or inaccurate citations in a final paper could have serious consequences ranging from a failing grade on the paper to a failing grade for the course. Because your annotated bibliography requires you to cite references using proper MLA format, any conventions that prove “difficult to understand and master” can be corrected at this point. Furthermore, the annotations for this bibliography might eventually find themselves as passages in your final paper where you need to briefly summarize an author’s main points before expanding on it using your own ideas.
References and Resources
Engle, Michael; Amy Blumenthal, and Tony Cosgrave. How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography 20 November 2002. Cornell University Library.
Fister, Barbara. “Fear of Reference.” The Chronicle of Higher Education 48.40 (2002): B20.
Gibaldi, Joseph. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. 6th ed. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2003.
Roth, Audrey J. The Research Paper. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999.
Raimes, Ann. “Differentiate Summary, Paraphrase, and Quotation—But Integrate and Cite Them All.” Keys for Writers: A Brief Handbook 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002. 107-110.
Wilhoit, Stephen. “Helping Students Avoid Plagiarism.” College Teaching 42.4 (1994): 161+.
Writers’ Workshop. Writing Summaries nd. University of Illinois.
Writing Center. Annotated Bibliographies 2003. University of Wisconsin at Madison.
Writing Center. Summaries nd. University College of the Fraser Valley.
Writing@CSU.
How to Summarize Effectively nd. Colorado State University.
|