Evaluating Research: Publisher's Reputation
Each type of publisher has a specialty while within each category, the various publishers have different reputations. For example, one publisher might be known for quickly bringing books to publication in order to earn quick money. Other publishers specialize in well-researched academic publications. And other publishers specialize in a specific genre, region, or type of book.
Discussion
Dr. Steven L. Berg has published three annotated bibliographies in the field of substance abuse.
NALGAP Annotated Bibliograph: Lesbians, Gay Men, and Substance Abuse. (Ft. Wayne, IN: National Association of Lesbian and Gay Alcoholism Professionals, 1989)
Jewish Alcoholism and Drug Addiction: An Annotated Bibliography. (Greenwood Press, 1993).
Spirituality and Addiction. (Wheeling, WV: Bishop of Books, 1993).
Although these books exhibit the same quality of research, Jewish Alcholism and Drug Addiction is the most credible of the three because of the reputation of the publisher: Greewood Press. The other two bibliographies were published by small presses that do not enjoy Greenwood Press' solid reputation. However, given that all of these books are more than 10 years old, none will reflect current information on their topics.
Special Notes on Web Pages
There are certain quality standards that are unique to web sites; standards that impact the reputation of the site. Credible web sites should:
be free of factual, grammarical, and logical errors.
be free of internal contraditions.
include citations or other bibliographic information.
be clearly organized with no distracting graphics or animation.
Furthermore, credible web sites are:
generally free of advertising.
most likely published by a college (.edu or .cc), non-profit organization (.org), government agency (.gov), or network(.net).
intended for a professional or educational audience.
Dr. Jeremy L. Hall has developed a rubric for Evaluating Web Page Content which we have published as Writing Fellows Handout #H010.
|